[MNT] Update ruff and mypy versions

[satvshr]

fixes #1639.

Only major changes in this PR:

1. ruff version update from v0.14.10 to v0.15.1
2. mypy version update from v1.13.0 to v1.19.1
   • Had to add a few files to be ignored by mypy (instead of using the suggested approach by @fkiraly to only check for files changed and then chip at it brick-by-brick to fix mypy errors, the architecture of those functions would most likely need to be changed, so if someone was adding a simple test they'd have to fix a ton of errors occuring in that file for other functions, which doesnt make sense)
3. Adding a fixed file ending check to prevent unwarranted git diffs
4. Removing trailspaces
5. Including the tests directory in ruff and mypy checks:
   • Fixed ruff wherever possible and added noqa tags to other places
   • Had to add a few files to be ignored by mypy (for the reason mentioned above in point 2)

[codecov-commenter]

Codecov Report

❌ Patch coverage is 82.35294% with 3 lines in your changes missing coverage. Please review.
✅ Project coverage is 52.87%. Comparing base (e95675a) to head (e4a3f0d).

Files with missing lines	Patch %	Lines
openml/cli.py	0.00%	1 Missing ⚠️
openml/flows/functions.py	0.00%	1 Missing ⚠️
openml/tasks/functions.py	0.00%	1 Missing ⚠️

Additional details and impacted files

@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##             main    #1637      +/-   ##
==========================================
+ Coverage   52.72%   52.87%   +0.14%     
==========================================
  Files          37       37              
  Lines        4381     4371      -10     
==========================================
+ Hits         2310     2311       +1     
+ Misses       2071     2060      -11     

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

🚀 New features to boost your workflow:

• ❄️ Test Analytics: Detect flaky tests, report on failures, and find test suite problems.

[geetu040]

I think we should keep skipping the tests/files directory. The content there is generated programmatically, and excluding it helps ensure we don't accidentally modify generated artifacts.

Not sure, but after this change it might make sense to adjust pre-commit-config.yaml or pyproject.toml make the skip rule less restrictive.

Also please sync with main, there are some conflicts.

Other than that, the rest of the changes look good to me.

[satvshr]

I think we should keep skipping the tests/files directory.

I think Franz was the one who told me to include the tests/files directory. We should discuss this today in the meeting.

[geetu040]

we should track this in an issue that the following files are being skipped by pre-commit, and should be updated with time.

[satvshr]

I'll open an issue if you'd like me too.

[geetu040]

yes please that would be nice, also mention how could one reproduce these failures, probably remove this file from the list right?

[satvshr]

what do you mean by "this" file over here?

[satvshr]

Opened an issue here. It could serve as a good first issue for new contributors, epsecially with the next ESoC around.

[geetu040]

what do you mean by "this" file over here?

I mean to reproduce these failures for a particular file one would simply remove for-example tests.test_datasets.test_dataset from the list module in pyproject.toml, right?

[satvshr]

yes

[fkiraly]

@PGijsbers should check whether the changes in the precommits are fine with the entire team