Update Definitions to Include Signature #262
Conversation
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Pull request overview
Copilot reviewed 146 out of 148 changed files in this pull request and generated 10 comments.
💡 Add Copilot custom instructions for smarter, more guided reviews. Learn how to get started.
definitions/standard/runtime_definition/control/std_control_stop.proto.json
Outdated
Show resolved
Hide resolved
definitions/standard/runtime_definition/number/std_number_ln.proto.json
Outdated
Show resolved
Hide resolved
definitions/standard/runtime_definition/array/std_array_is_empty.proto.json
Outdated
Show resolved
Hide resolved
definitions/standard/runtime_definition/object/std_object_keys.proto.json
Outdated
Show resolved
Hide resolved
definitions/standard/runtime_definition/number/std_number_from_text.proto.json
Outdated
Show resolved
Hide resolved
definitions/standard/runtime_definition/boolean/std_boolean_from_text.proto.json
Show resolved
Hide resolved
definitions/standard/runtime_definition/array/std_array_reverse.proto.json
Outdated
Show resolved
Hide resolved
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Pull request overview
Copilot reviewed 146 out of 148 changed files in this pull request and generated 2 comments.
💡 Add Copilot custom instructions for smarter, more guided reviews. Learn how to get started.
Co-authored-by: Copilot <175728472+Copilot@users.noreply.github.com> Signed-off-by: Raphael Götz <52959657+raphael-goetz@users.noreply.github.com>
| ], | ||
| "genericKeys": [] | ||
| "linked_data_type_identifiers": [], | ||
| "signature": "string" |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Is it really a string? You can parse in 0-11 and also the short term right? So JAN, FEB?
| ], | ||
| "genericKeys": [] | ||
| "linked_data_type_identifiers": [], | ||
| "signature": "string" |
| ], | ||
| "genericKeys": [] | ||
| "linked_data_type_identifiers": [], | ||
| "signature": "string" |
| ], | ||
| "genericKeys": [] | ||
| "linked_data_type_identifiers": [], | ||
| "signature": "string" |
| ], | ||
| "genericKeys": [] | ||
| "linked_data_type_identifiers": [], | ||
| "signature": "string" |
definitions/standard/runtime_definition/array/std_array_index_of.proto.json
Outdated
Show resolved
Hide resolved
definitions/standard/runtime_definition/number/std_number_clamp.proto.json
Show resolved
Hide resolved
| ], | ||
| "deprecationMessage": [], | ||
| "displayIcon": "tabler:cube", | ||
| "signature": "<T, K extends keyof OBJECT<T>>(object: OBJECT<T>, key: keyof OBJECT<T>, value: T[K]) => OBJECT<T>", |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
This doesn't make any sense for me, because with this logic you can only update existing fields and the value must be of the same type
| ], | ||
| "deprecationMessage": [], | ||
| "displayIcon": "tabler:toggle-left", | ||
| "signature": "(value: BOOLEAN) => BOOLEAN", |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
I'm not quite sure but we could poetically increase context here:
| "signature": "(value: BOOLEAN) => BOOLEAN", | |
| "signature": "(value: BOOLEAN) => !BOOLEAN", |
But I will need to testify this
definitions/standard/runtime_definition/object/std_object_get.proto.json
Show resolved
Hide resolved
9535701 to
745349b
Compare
Resolves: #256