Conversation
|
Deployment failed with the following error: View Documentation: https://vercel.com/docs/accounts/team-members-and-roles |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Pull request overview
Adds a new comparison blog post to the site content, including its corresponding banner image.
Changes:
- Added new blog article: “Convex vs Supabase” with front matter metadata and full post body
- Added the post’s banner image under
public/content/blog/convex-vs-supabase/
Reviewed changes
Copilot reviewed 1 out of 2 changed files in this pull request and generated 3 comments.
| File | Description |
|---|---|
| public/content/blog/convex-vs-supabase/banner.webp | Adds the feature/banner image referenced by the new post. |
| content/blog/convex-vs-supabase.md | New blog post content + metadata for the “Convex vs Supabase” comparison page. |
💡 Add Copilot custom instructions for smarter, more guided reviews. Learn how to get started.
|
|
||
| Neither approach is objectively better; it depends on where your team is more comfortable reasoning about access control. | ||
|
|
||
| ## Pricing |
content/blog/convex-vs-supabase.md
Outdated
| - You need full SQL power (complex queries, joins, aggregations, stored procedures) | ||
| - Your team already knows PostgreSQL and wants to stay in that ecosystem | ||
| - Self-hosting or data-residency compliance is a requirement | ||
| - You are building a product with a large and growing dataset where analytical queries matter |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
You are building a product with a large and growing dataset where analytical queries matter
This is debatable. PostgreSQL can't handle this well for large dataset. It requires a different tool (ClickHouse). Convex can argue they intentionally not provide incomplete solution.
| Both platforms support vector search. Supabase uses the `pgvector` PostgreSQL extension; Convex has built-in vector storage alongside its document database. Convex's reactive model is an advantage for AI apps that need real-time data updates (e.g., streaming chat with live context), while Supabase's full Postgres gives more flexibility for complex retrieval pipelines and hybrid search. | ||
|
|
||
| --- | ||
|
|
There was a problem hiding this comment.
As a fair comparison, it's ideal to list some 3rd migration articles coming from both side
Supabase -> Convex
Convex -> Supabase
adela-bytebase
force-pushed
the
a-branch-111
branch
from
b730d6f to
10c7c78
Compare
Co-authored-by: Copilot <175728472+Copilot@users.noreply.github.com>
adela-bytebase
force-pushed
the
a-branch-111
branch
from
10c7c78 to
6d420e3
Compare
| **Supabase → Convex** | ||
|
|
||
| - [Migrating from Supabase and Prisma to Convex](https://dev.to/ricardogesteves/migrating-from-supabase-and-prisma-accelerate-to-convex-jdk) – community walkthrough on dev.to | ||
| - [Is BaaS enterprise-ready? Hands-on review of Convex and Supabase](https://senacor.blog/is-backend-as-a-service-baas-enterprise-ready-a-hands-on-review-of-convex-and-supabase/) – independent engineering blog comparison |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
This is not a migration post, instead it's a comparison post like us. Not worth putting here.
No description provided.